Hi Stephen, you mention in your interview with "Dr. Deep State" that you are listening to Bishop Sanborn, which is good to get different perspective and insights. But I would also encourage you to include Fr. William Jenkins (SSPV), he has a weekly series called "What Catholics Believe", their position is non-dogmatic sedevacantist, or sede-doubtist. I think you will find it a good balance between Recognize and Resist and Sedevacanntisism.
If we promote sedevacantist influencers, who by their very affiliation are outside the Church, then we are promoting protestants. There are people in the Church who have a more powerful and truly Catholic juridical appr approach to solve this dire situation of the usurper pope. Fra Alex's fromrome.info
"If we promote sedevacantist influencers, who by their very affiliation are outside the Church, then we are promoting protestants."
That statement, where you equate sedevacantists with protestants, shows your ignorance of Church history. Sedevacantists preserve the Scripture and Tradition of the Catholic Church. Protestants revolt against and deform and destroy the Scripture and Tradition of the Catholic Church. (Look at the King James Bible and now the new sanitized Catholic version of the Bible. Look at the new Archbishop of Canterbury, it's a woman. And all their Protestant lesbian bishops. Leo XIV just appointed women to some of the highest ranking offices at the Vatican. The Lavender Mafia of the Catholic hierarchy is obviously Protestant. The Heresies In Vatican Council II https://vaticancatholic.com/what-really-happened-after-vatican-ii Those are some of the rotten fruits of Ecumenism with Protestants and the New Church of Vatican II.)
It is quite laughable that you would call the chameleon & buffoon as "a more powerful and truly Catholic juridical appr approach to solve this dire situation of the usurper pope. Fra Alex's fromrome.info."
Comparing Archbishop Lefebvre with Brother Bugnolo? Fra Alex is a midget.
Here's my response to your several comments to me. It's from Archbishop Lefebvre's speech wherein he even calls out Cardinal Ratzinger, the (false) pope of controlled-opposition Brother Alexis Bugnolo.
To leave the Church?
Of course, some may object: “Must one necessarily leave the visible Church in order not to lose one’s soul – leave the society of the faithful united to the pope?”
It is not we, but the modernists, who depart from the Church. As for saying “to leave the visible Church,” that is a mistake, for it confuses the official Church with the visible Church.
We belong indeed to the visible Church, to the society of the faithful under the authority of the Pope, for we do not reject the authority of the Pope, but what he does. We fully acknowledge the Pope’s authority; but when he uses it to do the opposite of what it was given to him for, it is evident that we cannot follow him.
To leave, then, the official Church? In a certain measure, yes, obviously. The entire book of Mr. Madiran, The Heresy of the Twentieth Century, is the history of the heresy of the bishops. One must therefore leave that milieu of the bishops, if one wishes not to lose one’s soul.
But that is not enough, for it is at Rome that the heresy is established. If the bishops are heretics (even without taking this term in its full canonical sense and consequences), it is not without the influence of Rome.
If we keep our distance from such people, it is exactly as with persons who have AIDS: one has no desire to catch it. Now they have spiritual AIDS – contagious diseases. If one wishes to preserve one’s health, one must not associate with them.
Yes, liberalism and modernism have entered the Council and the interior of the Church. These are revolutionary ideas, and the Revolution, which once existed in civil society, has passed into the Church. Cardinal Ratzinger does not conceal it: they have adopted ideas not of the Church, but of the world, and they think they must introduce them into our Church.
Now, the authorities have not changed one iota of their ideas on the Council, on liberalism, or on modernism. They are anti-Tradition – Tradition as we understand it and as the Church understands it. That does not fit into their concept. Theirs is an evolutionary concept; they are therefore opposed to that fixed Tradition in which we stand. We hold that everything the catechism teaches us comes from our Lord and from the Apostles, and that nothing in it is to be changed. It is clear. The three parts of the catechism come to us from our Lord. Why change them? We cannot make them evolve. The Creed, the Commandments of God, the Means of Salvation (the sacraments, the holy sacrifice of the Mass, and prayer) – all these come to us directly from our Lord. All this is our catechism, given to us generally with our baptism, placed into our hands. It is our charter, ever since our Lord willed that all should be baptised, that all should adopt the Creed, the Decalogue, the Sacraments which he instituted, as well as the holy sacrifice of the Mass and the prayers.
For them, no: all this evolves and has evolved with Vatican II. The present term of this evolution is Vatican II. That is why we cannot bind ourselves to Rome. We might have done so if we had been able to obtain complete protection, as we had requested. But they did not wish it. They refused the members we asked for on the Commission; they refused the number of bishops we requested; they refused the candidates I proposed to them. It was clear: they did not want us to be protected. They wish to have us directly under their control and to be able to impose upon us that anti-Tradition policy with which they are imbued.
Conference at a priests’ retreat at Ecône, 1988
Originally published in Fideliter n. 87, Nov-Dec, 1988.
I asked you a simple question and you reply with a vague statement about "the greatest controlled opposition"?
You are the one who is blinded by the buffoon Brother Alexis Bugnolo. You are like a hamster and fromrome.info is your wheel. At the end of the day, you are still locked up in a cage. That is what "controlled-opposition" do very cleverly. They keep spinning half-truths to keep you a prisoner, for life.
You and MaryinNorCal are foot soldiers sent to disturb the substacks of truth tellers like Stephen Kokx and Chris Jackson. Your task is to sow confusion and doubt and opposition in their substacks and videos.
Proof? MaryinNorCal clearly forbids Stephen to interview Bishop Sanborn and Father Jenkins because they are sedevantists but she tells readers to watch The Liar Behind the Lectern Karoline Leavitt.
You are incapable of making any intelligent response to Archbishop Lefebvre's speech so you simply say a nonsense statement and yell back a nonsensical phrase "Grow up" because your knowledge and intelligence are tiny as that of a hamster on a wheel.
Clarification is needed here, when you say "who by their very affiliation are outside the Church" it is important that the "Church" you refer to is not the Catholic Church, but it is the "Conciliar Church" or "Synodal Church", which we all should be outside of.
There is only one holy Catholic and apostolic Church. You need to submit to the pope in said one Church to be saved. The sedevacantists are outside of the Church because they have not submitted to the validly elected popes since 1958. So they are not Catholics! Simples
But is Prevost the Pope? Brother Alexis Bugnolo has done an excellent job proving that he is not for several reasons, most notably that there were too many Cardinals voting. Not to mention that Prevost has made heretical comments from the start and, to quote Saint Bellarmine, "A heretical Pope is not the Pope in the eyes of God." Remember that the Catholic Church isn't a cult. We don't just follow a heretical anti-Pope over a cliff.
I was from Chicago. Cupich is anti Catholic teaching. Senator Dick Durbin is so pro murdering babies is barbaric and horrific and Cupich and Prevost wanted to honor him. The list is long. These ppl are wolves.
Quite right, because Chris Jackson only attacks Trad Inc, he has never said that Leo XIV is not the pope, when juridically, he most certainly isn’t. And you quote a sedevacantist site to disparage a good and true Catholic.
A chameleon and a clown? What a most un-charitable way of talking about a monk with whom you disagree. He's amazingly deep and wise in his assessments, in my view.
There’s no better evidence of what Kokx has said above, than Jalsevac’s latest LSN damage control apologetic, which more or less states that Westin’s attempt to make LSN more traditional confused and alienated both board and readership (!!!), and therefore they need to go back to full conciliarism, which has the numbers and money the trads are lacking.
That’s a defense?!?!
You need to read it yourself to believe he really said it out loud, in as many words:
"Francis is humble, he rode the subway." Right, and the picture of him on the Buenos Aires subway shows him with his right hand tucked into his shirt, the sign of Freemasonry.
I recall one on-target comment back in 2013 when Francis made that visit to Brazil. The commenter noted how Francis flew half way round the world in a huge plane with his name on it....then transferred to a 'umble small car.
One estimate of the cost of Francis living in the guest house at the Vatican, rather than the Papal Palace, was perhaps 30 million dollars over 12 years. As one unhappy Indian complained about Mahatma Ghandi, how much it cost to keep the Great Man in Holy Poverty.
The trouble with lay celebrity 'self-sent-apostles' with large families is they can easily be black-mailed, if only by their own foggy consciences, to sell out Truth for the comfort of temporal 'cushions' (Ezechial 13:18).
This is pure distraction on what should really be reported which is the double scandal of the cardinals electing a twice accused pedophile protector, and the invalid election because the cardinals chose to breach papal law on the maximum limit of electors and elected a candidate who had made declarations against Catholic doctrine (heresy!).
Read up on what is not been discussed anywhere by any Catholic media!!
Bannon?! Seriously that alone makes everything you say to be compromised, even Fr. Nix, please!!! Those 2 are "Maga" that discredits your point. Sorry but if you don't want to be part of " trade inc" then learn the truth about those you named
Let's see if I have this straight: a) Bp. Strickland refuted the claim that J-HW was fired for telling the truth; b) Lifesite then latched onto his testimony, publishing it as evidence there was no foul play; and c) Bp. Strickland is himself a defender of truth, calling out Pope Leo as he sees fit. So if Lifesite is carrying the water for Pope Leo and purging naysayers, why would they amplify the voice of another outspoken critic of the Pope Leo papacy? All part of a strategy to confuse the issue?
Have you seen some of his latest posts? He is speaking out against the pope’s appointments. I think we are all trying to come to terms with this Leo XIV. We hope and pray he will unify Holy Mother Church in the truth that is Jesus Christ, and we ask our brethren to be patient, but we are daily disappointed.
It seems very ill advised for outsiders - those not involved and who have never been directly involved with LSN - to be commenting so extensively as this youtuber has done (I've never heard of John McLane before now). There's a danger in "hot takes". It's been less than 24 hours since the announcement was made. Speculating from the outside, or simply plainly making things up, can scarcely be said to be contributing meaningfully.
Everyone in the world is allowed to speculate. No law against it.
Anyone who disapproves of speculation is welcome to reveal the true details of what actually happened. But if they don't reveal these, then there will definitely be speculation.
The massive shift is being caused by Pelican Plus that will be the biggest Catholic media network, that will gather all popular Trad Inc. influencers under one umbrella, and will be pay them a hefty salary that they can't resist, as revealed by the Traditional Thomist in "My FINAL Video...." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2GntjBWu-0
You trust Steve Bannon?? I read FitzInfo.net . He has a big list of Controlled Opposition. Vigano included. Taylor Marshal. I'm at the age I don't trust most.
Three of the tell-tale signs of controlled-opposition$ are 1) They attack a basic core belief of Roman Catholicism, e.g. Fitzinfo attacks Our Lady of Fatima apparitions, and Brother Bugnolo mangles up the papacy and attacks Catholic truth tellers who defend the Catholic Faith like Chris Jackson and Archbishop Lefebvre. 2) They will condone Vatican II and its popes, thus promote Leo XIV by adulating him and anything petty that he will say and do, and they will utter the names of Vatican II fake saints "Saint" John Paul II, which a lot of priests and influencer$ and podcaster$ do. 3) They will never demand to abrogate Vatican II, e.g. Taylor Marshall, Michael Matt, Matt Fradd, Brother Bugnolo and Diane Montagna will never demand it. Trad Inc. will never discuss the Vatican Ii deceptions. Stephen Kokx is one of the first ones to demand it in the Counter-Revolutionary Traditional Catholic Movement. https://kokxnews.substack.com/p/the-counter-revolutionary-traditional
Fitz didn't respond. I told him it was vile. I recommend him, Fatima weirdness aside. One is his page explaining the True Jesuit Conspiracy and second is his page re "Christ Mythicism." Both can be a resource in debating Catholic haters online.
Good. The most important conversation that Catholics worldwide must have is the abrogation of Vatican II and all its documents that have been eroding the Catholic Church for 60 years since 1965 and is now reaching its climax with Leo XIV.
The Truth about What Really Happened to the Catholic Church after Vatican II (658-page book, 200 color photographs and over 1,700 references; free pdfs)
All Catholics should also read this small book that will show them how their seemingly nice Catholic priest could be an actual atheist who hate the Catholic Church with every fibre of his being. This book shows how this communist was destroying the Catholic Church as an imposter priest. Have you read this?
"This has caused a vacuum that is slowly being filled by Chris Jackson, The Catholic Esquire, Fr. David Nix, Steve Bannon, and a few others."
Add the name of Fr Isaac Relyea to the list.
Fr Isaac wrings his hands, and laments and groans, 'arrghh, we have a pope.' No, Fr Isaac, we don't.
I was exposing these problems for years and LifeSiteNews dismissed me like McElroy dismissed Richard Sipe. See: www.gomulka.net and https://johneighteenthirtyseven.substack.com
Hi Stephen, you mention in your interview with "Dr. Deep State" that you are listening to Bishop Sanborn, which is good to get different perspective and insights. But I would also encourage you to include Fr. William Jenkins (SSPV), he has a weekly series called "What Catholics Believe", their position is non-dogmatic sedevacantist, or sede-doubtist. I think you will find it a good balance between Recognize and Resist and Sedevacanntisism.
If we promote sedevacantist influencers, who by their very affiliation are outside the Church, then we are promoting protestants. There are people in the Church who have a more powerful and truly Catholic juridical appr approach to solve this dire situation of the usurper pope. Fra Alex's fromrome.info
"If we promote sedevacantist influencers, who by their very affiliation are outside the Church, then we are promoting protestants."
That statement, where you equate sedevacantists with protestants, shows your ignorance of Church history. Sedevacantists preserve the Scripture and Tradition of the Catholic Church. Protestants revolt against and deform and destroy the Scripture and Tradition of the Catholic Church. (Look at the King James Bible and now the new sanitized Catholic version of the Bible. Look at the new Archbishop of Canterbury, it's a woman. And all their Protestant lesbian bishops. Leo XIV just appointed women to some of the highest ranking offices at the Vatican. The Lavender Mafia of the Catholic hierarchy is obviously Protestant. The Heresies In Vatican Council II https://vaticancatholic.com/what-really-happened-after-vatican-ii Those are some of the rotten fruits of Ecumenism with Protestants and the New Church of Vatican II.)
It is quite laughable that you would call the chameleon & buffoon as "a more powerful and truly Catholic juridical appr approach to solve this dire situation of the usurper pope. Fra Alex's fromrome.info."
Comparing Archbishop Lefebvre with Brother Bugnolo? Fra Alex is a midget.
Here's my response to your several comments to me. It's from Archbishop Lefebvre's speech wherein he even calls out Cardinal Ratzinger, the (false) pope of controlled-opposition Brother Alexis Bugnolo.
To leave the Church?
Of course, some may object: “Must one necessarily leave the visible Church in order not to lose one’s soul – leave the society of the faithful united to the pope?”
It is not we, but the modernists, who depart from the Church. As for saying “to leave the visible Church,” that is a mistake, for it confuses the official Church with the visible Church.
We belong indeed to the visible Church, to the society of the faithful under the authority of the Pope, for we do not reject the authority of the Pope, but what he does. We fully acknowledge the Pope’s authority; but when he uses it to do the opposite of what it was given to him for, it is evident that we cannot follow him.
To leave, then, the official Church? In a certain measure, yes, obviously. The entire book of Mr. Madiran, The Heresy of the Twentieth Century, is the history of the heresy of the bishops. One must therefore leave that milieu of the bishops, if one wishes not to lose one’s soul.
But that is not enough, for it is at Rome that the heresy is established. If the bishops are heretics (even without taking this term in its full canonical sense and consequences), it is not without the influence of Rome.
If we keep our distance from such people, it is exactly as with persons who have AIDS: one has no desire to catch it. Now they have spiritual AIDS – contagious diseases. If one wishes to preserve one’s health, one must not associate with them.
Yes, liberalism and modernism have entered the Council and the interior of the Church. These are revolutionary ideas, and the Revolution, which once existed in civil society, has passed into the Church. Cardinal Ratzinger does not conceal it: they have adopted ideas not of the Church, but of the world, and they think they must introduce them into our Church.
Now, the authorities have not changed one iota of their ideas on the Council, on liberalism, or on modernism. They are anti-Tradition – Tradition as we understand it and as the Church understands it. That does not fit into their concept. Theirs is an evolutionary concept; they are therefore opposed to that fixed Tradition in which we stand. We hold that everything the catechism teaches us comes from our Lord and from the Apostles, and that nothing in it is to be changed. It is clear. The three parts of the catechism come to us from our Lord. Why change them? We cannot make them evolve. The Creed, the Commandments of God, the Means of Salvation (the sacraments, the holy sacrifice of the Mass, and prayer) – all these come to us directly from our Lord. All this is our catechism, given to us generally with our baptism, placed into our hands. It is our charter, ever since our Lord willed that all should be baptised, that all should adopt the Creed, the Decalogue, the Sacraments which he instituted, as well as the holy sacrifice of the Mass and the prayers.
For them, no: all this evolves and has evolved with Vatican II. The present term of this evolution is Vatican II. That is why we cannot bind ourselves to Rome. We might have done so if we had been able to obtain complete protection, as we had requested. But they did not wish it. They refused the members we asked for on the Commission; they refused the number of bishops we requested; they refused the candidates I proposed to them. It was clear: they did not want us to be protected. They wish to have us directly under their control and to be able to impose upon us that anti-Tradition policy with which they are imbued.
Conference at a priests’ retreat at Ecône, 1988
Originally published in Fideliter n. 87, Nov-Dec, 1988.
Full text https://www.wmreview.org/p/lefebvre-visibility-church
Fra Alex's fromrome.info is controlled-opposition inside Rome
https://novusordowatch.org/?s=Brother+Alexis+Bugnolo+
https://www.traditioninaction.org/religious/m037rpFootsteps.htm
Oh yes he is, by the Good Lord
What does "controlled-opposition" mean to you?
If you knew what "controlled-opposition" truly meant, you won't be rejoicing, and certainly not in the name of the Good Lord.
You are so blinded that you cannot see that the greatest controlled opposition is to that of almighty God. Grow up!
I asked you a simple question and you reply with a vague statement about "the greatest controlled opposition"?
You are the one who is blinded by the buffoon Brother Alexis Bugnolo. You are like a hamster and fromrome.info is your wheel. At the end of the day, you are still locked up in a cage. That is what "controlled-opposition" do very cleverly. They keep spinning half-truths to keep you a prisoner, for life.
You and MaryinNorCal are foot soldiers sent to disturb the substacks of truth tellers like Stephen Kokx and Chris Jackson. Your task is to sow confusion and doubt and opposition in their substacks and videos.
Proof? MaryinNorCal clearly forbids Stephen to interview Bishop Sanborn and Father Jenkins because they are sedevantists but she tells readers to watch The Liar Behind the Lectern Karoline Leavitt.
You are incapable of making any intelligent response to Archbishop Lefebvre's speech so you simply say a nonsense statement and yell back a nonsensical phrase "Grow up" because your knowledge and intelligence are tiny as that of a hamster on a wheel.
Clarification is needed here, when you say "who by their very affiliation are outside the Church" it is important that the "Church" you refer to is not the Catholic Church, but it is the "Conciliar Church" or "Synodal Church", which we all should be outside of.
There is only one holy Catholic and apostolic Church. You need to submit to the pope in said one Church to be saved. The sedevacantists are outside of the Church because they have not submitted to the validly elected popes since 1958. So they are not Catholics! Simples
But is Prevost the Pope? Brother Alexis Bugnolo has done an excellent job proving that he is not for several reasons, most notably that there were too many Cardinals voting. Not to mention that Prevost has made heretical comments from the start and, to quote Saint Bellarmine, "A heretical Pope is not the Pope in the eyes of God." Remember that the Catholic Church isn't a cult. We don't just follow a heretical anti-Pope over a cliff.
No Pope would ever allow same sex blessings. If every Catholic doenst know that, then thays really rock bottom.
I was from Chicago. Cupich is anti Catholic teaching. Senator Dick Durbin is so pro murdering babies is barbaric and horrific and Cupich and Prevost wanted to honor him. The list is long. These ppl are wolves.
Brother Alexis Bugnolo is a chameleon and a clown
https://novusordowatch.org/?s=Brother+Alexis+Bugnolo+
He keeps disparaging Chris Jackson...
Quite right, because Chris Jackson only attacks Trad Inc, he has never said that Leo XIV is not the pope, when juridically, he most certainly isn’t. And you quote a sedevacantist site to disparage a good and true Catholic.
A chameleon and a clown? What a most un-charitable way of talking about a monk with whom you disagree. He's amazingly deep and wise in his assessments, in my view.
A pope who is not faithful to the deposit of faith should not be followed!
There’s no better evidence of what Kokx has said above, than Jalsevac’s latest LSN damage control apologetic, which more or less states that Westin’s attempt to make LSN more traditional confused and alienated both board and readership (!!!), and therefore they need to go back to full conciliarism, which has the numbers and money the trads are lacking.
That’s a defense?!?!
You need to read it yourself to believe he really said it out loud, in as many words:
https://x.com/jalsevacs/status/1943060853881999769?s=46&t=R4xyMNVYgeB6hu6jyd3HHA
He has since removed it - unsurprisingly! They're scrambling!
Not the readership. As in not the peasants just the shills.
"Francis is humble, he rode the subway." Right, and the picture of him on the Buenos Aires subway shows him with his right hand tucked into his shirt, the sign of Freemasonry.
I recall one on-target comment back in 2013 when Francis made that visit to Brazil. The commenter noted how Francis flew half way round the world in a huge plane with his name on it....then transferred to a 'umble small car.
One estimate of the cost of Francis living in the guest house at the Vatican, rather than the Papal Palace, was perhaps 30 million dollars over 12 years. As one unhappy Indian complained about Mahatma Ghandi, how much it cost to keep the Great Man in Holy Poverty.
The trouble with lay celebrity 'self-sent-apostles' with large families is they can easily be black-mailed, if only by their own foggy consciences, to sell out Truth for the comfort of temporal 'cushions' (Ezechial 13:18).
The sheep are scattered. We have no pope.
This is pure distraction on what should really be reported which is the double scandal of the cardinals electing a twice accused pedophile protector, and the invalid election because the cardinals chose to breach papal law on the maximum limit of electors and elected a candidate who had made declarations against Catholic doctrine (heresy!).
Read up on what is not been discussed anywhere by any Catholic media!!
https://www.fromrome.info/2025/06/01/project-save-rome/
Alexis Bugnolo’s Fake Conclave elects Successor to Benedict XVI, but you WON’T guess whom!
https://novusordowatch.org/?s=Brother+Alexis+Bugnolo+
Bannon?! Seriously that alone makes everything you say to be compromised, even Fr. Nix, please!!! Those 2 are "Maga" that discredits your point. Sorry but if you don't want to be part of " trade inc" then learn the truth about those you named
Bannon is a self-professed Zionist!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/s5Jea72uP24i/
Strongly agree about Steve "we got the Trads" Bannon. I smell more dialectical rats incoming.
Let's see if I have this straight: a) Bp. Strickland refuted the claim that J-HW was fired for telling the truth; b) Lifesite then latched onto his testimony, publishing it as evidence there was no foul play; and c) Bp. Strickland is himself a defender of truth, calling out Pope Leo as he sees fit. So if Lifesite is carrying the water for Pope Leo and purging naysayers, why would they amplify the voice of another outspoken critic of the Pope Leo papacy? All part of a strategy to confuse the issue?
It worked…. I’m confused
Have you seen some of his latest posts? He is speaking out against the pope’s appointments. I think we are all trying to come to terms with this Leo XIV. We hope and pray he will unify Holy Mother Church in the truth that is Jesus Christ, and we ask our brethren to be patient, but we are daily disappointed.
It seems very ill advised for outsiders - those not involved and who have never been directly involved with LSN - to be commenting so extensively as this youtuber has done (I've never heard of John McLane before now). There's a danger in "hot takes". It's been less than 24 hours since the announcement was made. Speculating from the outside, or simply plainly making things up, can scarcely be said to be contributing meaningfully.
Everyone in the world is allowed to speculate. No law against it.
Anyone who disapproves of speculation is welcome to reveal the true details of what actually happened. But if they don't reveal these, then there will definitely be speculation.
Dude seriously it's not 1995, we don't call the apostates 'liberals' anymore. Can the schtick please.
Those who attack Archbishop LeFebvre are wrong.
The massive shift is being caused by Pelican Plus that will be the biggest Catholic media network, that will gather all popular Trad Inc. influencers under one umbrella, and will be pay them a hefty salary that they can't resist, as revealed by the Traditional Thomist in "My FINAL Video...." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2GntjBWu-0
See also,
https://kokxnews.substack.com/p/reclaiming-the-traditional-catholic/comment/158054383
Quite a statement.
This chaos within the traditionalist and conservative movement seems CIA orchestrated to me. Let's not fall for it.
You trust Steve Bannon?? I read FitzInfo.net . He has a big list of Controlled Opposition. Vigano included. Taylor Marshal. I'm at the age I don't trust most.
https://fitzinfo.net/carlo-maria-vigano-dossier/
https://fitzinfo.net/controlled-opposition/
Fitzinfo.net denigrates Our Lady of Fatima apparitions which makes him a controlled-opposition. Check his article on it.
I wrote to Fitz. I complained.
Good! Please let me know what he will say.
Three of the tell-tale signs of controlled-opposition$ are 1) They attack a basic core belief of Roman Catholicism, e.g. Fitzinfo attacks Our Lady of Fatima apparitions, and Brother Bugnolo mangles up the papacy and attacks Catholic truth tellers who defend the Catholic Faith like Chris Jackson and Archbishop Lefebvre. 2) They will condone Vatican II and its popes, thus promote Leo XIV by adulating him and anything petty that he will say and do, and they will utter the names of Vatican II fake saints "Saint" John Paul II, which a lot of priests and influencer$ and podcaster$ do. 3) They will never demand to abrogate Vatican II, e.g. Taylor Marshall, Michael Matt, Matt Fradd, Brother Bugnolo and Diane Montagna will never demand it. Trad Inc. will never discuss the Vatican Ii deceptions. Stephen Kokx is one of the first ones to demand it in the Counter-Revolutionary Traditional Catholic Movement. https://kokxnews.substack.com/p/the-counter-revolutionary-traditional
Fitz didn't respond. I told him it was vile. I recommend him, Fatima weirdness aside. One is his page explaining the True Jesuit Conspiracy and second is his page re "Christ Mythicism." Both can be a resource in debating Catholic haters online.
https://fitzinfo.net/2015/02/03/fallacies-of-the-jesuit-conspiracy-theory/
https://fitzinfo.net/christ-mythicism-debunked/
Good. The most important conversation that Catholics worldwide must have is the abrogation of Vatican II and all its documents that have been eroding the Catholic Church for 60 years since 1965 and is now reaching its climax with Leo XIV.
The Truth about What Really Happened to the Catholic Church after Vatican II (658-page book, 200 color photographs and over 1,700 references; free pdfs)
https://vaticancatholic.com/what-really-happened-after-vatican-ii
The Heresies In Vatican Council II (visual proofs)
https://vaticancatholic.com/vatican-ii-council/
All Catholics should also read this small book that will show them how their seemingly nice Catholic priest could be an actual atheist who hate the Catholic Church with every fibre of his being. This book shows how this communist was destroying the Catholic Church as an imposter priest. Have you read this?
AA-1025 The Memoirs of an Anti-apostle
https://dn790009.ca.archive.org/0/items/Aa-1025TheMemoirsOfAnAnti-apostle/Aa-1025TheMemoirsOfAnAnti-apostle.pdf (FREE)
Republished as
AA-1025 Memoirs of the Communist Infiltration Into the Church