EXPLOSIVE Debate With Dr. Ed Mazza On Vatican II, Modernism, And Sedevacantism
Covering a wide array of issues.
Tonight at 8pm EST, Dr. Ed Mazza joins the show to discuss his latest book Saints vs. Antipopes.
Support independent Traditional Catholic media. Become a monthly supporter or make a one-time donation. Rest assured you are in our prayers.
Steve, you blew Mazza out of the water and more than proved that the Sedevacantists have everything absolutely correct. Dr. Mazza made his Ph.D in theology look like he earned it in a Novos Ordo, post-Vatican II college. His arguments about what constitutes a heretic also fell way short of what Modernists actually teach. Remember that Pius X said that Modernism is the most dangerous form of heresy because it not only teaches parts of defined doctrine and dogma, but mixes all forms of condemned heresy in with the truth. At any rate, he is absolutely wrong about the post-conciliar antipopes. They all clearly embraced the heresies promoted and promulgated by Montini and his successors. Furthermore, Montini changed the prayers of the rites of Holy Orders and episcopal consecrations in such a way that we have invalid Novus Ordo Holy Orders. The Novus Ordo sect does not possess all four marks of the Church. Hence, it is an antichurch led by antipopes. End of discussion. End of debate.
Stephen
Dr Mazda is a nice guy but the mental gymnastics to put the circle in a square is tragic. He is just a different variety of R & R. With respect to quoting St Louis de Monfront, he forgets to mention that half of the True Devotion books talks about false devotion to Our Lady even though someone appears to be devout. I’m with your opinion. Great job